Email:

MEDIA CONTACT
To interview one of IWPR’s experts or for other media questions, please contact Erica Williams at (202) 785-5100 or williams@iwpr.org.

IWPR EXPERTS ON SOCIAL SECURITY ISSUES
Heidi Hartmann, Ph.D.
President and MacArthur Fellow
Sunhwa Lee, Ph.D.
Study Director

Lois Shaw, Ph.D.
Senior Consulting Economist 

Women and Social Security Alert (WomenSSA)
The IWPR Women and Social Security email alert provides women-oriented information on and analysis of proposed changes in Social Security, up-to-date developments in the debate, and current research and statistics.

Click here for ARCHIVED WomenSSA ALERTS

WomenSSA No. 22
November 2006

ITEMS IN THIS ALERT:

New Research
 The Economic Security of Older Women and Men
 AARP Surveys Voters and Candidates about Social Security

In the News
Election Results May Revive or Kill Plans to Privatize Social Security


NEW RESEARCH

The Economic Security of Older Women and Men
In a series of new fact sheets on “The Economic Security of Older Women and Men” by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) uses the Census Bureau’s 2002-2005 March Current Population Survey data to examine poverty and sources of retirement income for women and men 65 and older in California, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The data is also disaggregated by race and ethnicity and marital status to underline disparities among women. IWPR’s analysis shows that in each of these states, 80 to 90 percent of women and men 65 and older receive Social Security benefits.

IWPR’s research finds a common story for older women across these different states. For example, Social Security is a substantial source of income for women in all six states. In Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, Social Security benefits make up the majority of older women’s income (52, 56, 52, and 54 percent, respectively). In California and Virginia Social Security benefits make up the largest source of older women’s income (45 and 43 percent, respectively). In all states, women are far less likely to receive pension income than men, with only 1 in 3 receiving pension income in Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, and only 1 in 4 receiving pension income in California and Florida.

Additionally, 50 percent or more of older women in these states are not married (defined as widowed, divorced, or never married), especially older African American women. African American women and Hispanic women in California, Florida, and New Jersey, and African American women in Michigan Pennsylvania, and Virginia are also the most likely to be poor and the least likely to have income from assets like savings accounts and stocks and bonds. IWPR’s fact sheets emphasize the need for policies that address the economic situation of today’s older women and men and that of future older Americans, and point to the importance of protecting and strengthening Social Security.

AARP Surveys Voters and Candidates about Social Security
In a summary of one in a series of election issue surveys, “AARP Election Watch: Pulse of a Generation, October 23, 2006”, the AARP provides a look at the importance of Social Security to the fall 2006 midterm elections. The telephone survey polled 1,503 people age 42 and older, a segment of the population that is most likely to vote, about how the issue of Social Security might impact their voting decisions. The survey results show that 72 percent of respondents (70.1 percent of men and 73.8 percent of women*) oppose the use of tax dollars to fund private accounts. In addition to strong opposition to private accounts, the survey found strong support for strengthening Social Security. Eighty percent of those surveyed (76.7 percent of men and 83.5 percent of women) said that they would want to see candidates work to improve the program. When asked whether they were likely to vote for a candidate that supported private accounts, 65 percent of those surveyed (62.5 percent of men and 66.5 percent of women) said it was not likely. The AARP’s survey results point to Social Security as a significant election issue for likely voters age 42 and older.

*Breakdowns by gender were provided for IWPR by the AARP and are not included in the published summary of survey results.

top


IN THE NEWS

Election Results May Revive or Kill Plans to Privatize Social Security
In a recently televised interview, President Bush reaffirmed his plans to revive the debate around Social Security privatization following the upcoming Congressional elections. He expressed his belief that Republicans would maintain their control of the House and Senate and said that Social Security reform would be one of his top two priorities for his final two years in office, along with immigration. Support for the President’s plans to privatize has dwindled, with some Republicans again distancing themselves from the president’s stance on Social Security, much like they did over a year ago when it became clear that privatization was highly unpopular among voters. In fact, a recent Washington Post article discussed the results of an AARP candidate survey of competitive House and Senate races, in which Republican candidates largely avoided taking a stand on privatization or opposed it entirely. For more information see: “Social Security Enters Elections,” (Washington Post, October 25, 2006), and “Bush Plans to Revive Social Security Proposal with New Congress,” (Bloomberg.com, October 22, 2006).

top

In January 2005, just as the debate on Social Security reform was getting underway, we launched the IWPR Women and Social Security Alert (WomenSSA). According to the positive feedback we received from you – our colleagues, our members, and advocates on this issue – this special alert system has proven to be a comprehensive resource in helping you to stay at the forefront of this topic and its effect on women. Please help us continue to produce this beneficial resource by contributing to our special Women and Social Security Alert Fund today! With your help, we will ensure the continued distribution of this important information on Social Security reform and those most affected – women. PLEASE CONTRIBUTE NOW!

 

Institute for Women's Policy Research 1707 L Street, NW, Suite 750 ~ Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202.785.5100 ~ Fax: 202.833.4362 ~ Email: iwpr@iwpr.org

© 2006 by IWPR